Taste Test Thursday - Memory's Daughters

Stabile, Susan M. (2004). Introduction: The Genealogy of Memory, Part One: Memory. Memory’s Daughters: The Material Culture of Remembrance in Eighteenth-Century America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1-125.

Rather than use words like culture or artifacts, Susan Stabile chooses terms like “topophilic” (love of place) and “materialized memory” (14). These are terms Stabile explores throughout the book especially in regards to the writings of 18^th century women such as Deborah Norris Logan, Elizabeth Fergusson, Hannah Griffits, Susanna Wright, and Annis Stockton. Drawing from their commonplace books, manuscripts and poems, Stabile reconstructs the material world these women preserved through their remembrances or memory.

As a result Stabile maps a remarkable symmetry between the interior homes of the women and their innermost minds – she “interpreted vernacular architecture as palaces of memory” (14) – a type of topophilic materialism. Since the writers experience the world through their senses and often remember through sensational triggers of smells, sights, sounds, touch and taste, their minds are recording their local history, the experiences of their time. This idea is promoted by the 18^th century philosophy of associationism, “Which postulated a direct, physical link connecting domestic architecture, material objects, and memory” (30). This parallel between material form of architecture and the immaterial form of ideas is unified together and communicated when written. The writing is the materialization of memory.  

Stabile states: “The commonplace book, then, is an archive in both senses of the word: as a physical object, it represents rhetorical topoi, or places for memory storage; as a text, it is the very stuff of memory making” (16). It is important to note that Stabile makes it clear that without memory or association, the objects would not be recorded and thus unarchived making them immaterial. Deborah Logan comments on this when discussing the lack of material evidence of her female ancestors. Stabile also addresses this with regards to Susanna Wright who was a Quaker and had a disregard for material possession. As a result, there is little material evidence for Wright. The point being that humans, or women in this case, project meaning onto object through their sentimental associations of memory and materialize their meaning through writing or deposition.

How does this apply to literature?

Stabile’s approach to view the literature and the space in which those writing were created exposes a dynamic of history that may not be usually considered when reading or writing history. I would think with reading or creating period writing one needs to consider how gender and class simultaneously reflect the physical place and the place of the mind/memory.

Word Count: 399

Total Edits:  0